The Culture Of Ignorance Strikes Again – In Academia, Where Counterintuitively It Usually Strikes

Reference:         https://www.wsj.com/articles/college-common-app-drops-question-about-discipline-citing-racial-disparities-11601494201?mod=djem10point

                Many students applying to college use what is called the “Common Application,” which is “submitted by more than 1 million students to more than 900 colleges and universities.”  Until now, it “requested that students disclose whether they’d been found responsible for a ‘disciplinary violation.’ That could be academic or behavioral misconduct, and would have led to probation, suspension or expulsion.”

                Seems sensible, doesn’t it?  If you are evaluating an applicant, isn’t their prior school disciplinary history something that can be fairly considered?  All other things being equal, wouldn’t you admit the kid with no disciplinary history over the one who has one?  Of course you would, though you might ask some questions before making that decision, like what were the circumstances of that discipline?  There certainly is plenty of rinky-dink discipline handed out in K-12, and sometimes administrators just have it in for certain kids, deserved or not. 

                But in keeping with a standard leftist theme preferring ignorance over knowledge when it comes to race issues (unless it supports the alleged notion of systematic racism), the Common Application is dropping that question about prior discipline, asserting that “racial disparities” make the question unfair.  According to the Common Application, “[b]lack applicants reported they were suspended or expelled more than twice as often as white applicants.”  It aims to “eliminate what it says could be an obstacle for Black students considering college.” 

                As the Wall Street Journal reports, “[a]fter a deep dive into its own data earlier this year, funded by a Gates Foundation grant, the Common App found that Black applicants marked ‘yes’ more than twice as often as white applicants.  Black women were three times as likely as white women to say they’d been disciplined.  And those who did give affirmative responses submitted applications at a lower rate. . . . . ‘It’s clearly inconsistent and inequitable and disproportionately impacting low-income and students of color,’ said Jenny Rickard, president and CEO of the Common App.” 

                Well, perhaps that might be true if one assumes the perspectives of blacks and whites are identical and both share the identical definition of “discipline”.  However, that is completely opposed to the views of the BLM, snowflakes, blackflakes and “social justice” loudmouths.  Their whole notion of “white privilege” supposes that whites have a different (and more advantageous) perspective than blacks, who have never had any “privilege” at all.

                And so what anyway?  Of course colleges themselves can ask the same questions on supplemental applications and presumably many do, or now will be forced to.  But to remove a question seeking plainly relevant information in an effort to simply hide the truth – whether that truth is fair or not – is just stupid.  The assumption that supposed “racial disparities” means that the information is useless is just stupid.  The assumption that discipline should be strictly in accordance with the relative percentages of the races is just stupid.  To deliberately deprive yourself of relevant information in the name of racial justice is just stupid. 

                The issue should not be whether or not you have the information, it should be how you use it.  This deliberate ignorance is a phony attempt to protect blacks at the expense of everyone else.  The message is certainly clear – you get a free pass if you’re black.  Every system one could ever envision is going to produce some level of racial or class disparities, but let’s not let that get in the way of pandering to the loudmouth minorities yelping at the door. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *